Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:08

Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do some men like older women?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Astronomers discover the largest 'ultramassive' black hole ever seen - Earth.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ducks Select Center McQueen 10th Overall in First Round of 2025 NHL Draft - NHL.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why are European countries warning European travelers to be careful traveling to the United States?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.